12-13-2016 11:54 AM - last edited on 12-14-2016 05:50 PM by RogersMaude
Announced 13-December-2016 by @RogersDave http://communityforums.rogers.com/t5/forums/forumtopicpage/board-id/Getting_connected/message-id/379...
Credit to @Hybrid_Noodle
Hitron website: http://www.hitron-americas.com/product/coda-4582/
Datasheet: http://www.hitron-americas.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/CODA-4582-Datasheet.pdf
60W Power Supply built into unit
Pictures of Hardware Version 1A:
***Added Labels***
01-16-2017 05:59 PM - edited 01-16-2017 06:06 PM
@Datalink I waited just so that I can give you my results:
Port ID | Frequency (MHz) | Modulation | Signal strength (dBmV) | Channel ID | Signal noise ratio (dB) |
1 | 669000000 | 256QAM | 3.200 | 19 | 40.946 |
2 | 561000000 | 256QAM | 2.300 | 2 | 40.946 |
3 | 567000000 | 256QAM | 2.600 | 3 | 40.366 |
4 | 573000000 | 256QAM | 2.500 | 4 | 40.946 |
5 | 579000000 | 256QAM | 2.900 | 5 | 40.366 |
6 | 585000000 | 256QAM | 2.600 | 6 | 40.946 |
7 | 591000000 | 256QAM | 2.700 | 7 | 40.366 |
8 | 597000000 | 256QAM | 2.400 | 8 | 40.946 |
9 | 603000000 | 256QAM | 2.400 | 9 | 40.366 |
10 | 609000000 | 256QAM | 2.300 | 10 | 40.946 |
11 | 615000000 | 256QAM | 2.300 | 11 | 40.366 |
12 | 621000000 | 256QAM | 2.400 | 12 | 40.946 |
13 | 633000000 | 256QAM | 3.300 | 13 | 40.366 |
14 | 639000000 | 256QAM | 3.200 | 14 | 40.366 |
15 | 645000000 | 256QAM | 3.600 | 15 | 40.366 |
16 | 651000000 | 256QAM | 3.400 | 16 | 40.366 |
17 | 657000000 | 256QAM | 3.400 | 17 | 40.366 |
18 | 663000000 | 256QAM | 3.000 | 18 | 40.946 |
19 | 555000000 | 256QAM | 2.400 | 1 | 40.366 |
20 | 675000000 | 256QAM | 3.000 | 20 | 40.946 |
21 | 681000000 | 256QAM | 3.100 | 21 | 40.366 |
22 | 687000000 | 256QAM | 2.900 | 22 | 40.946 |
23 | 693000000 | 256QAM | 2.800 | 23 | 40.946 |
24 | 699000000 | 256QAM | 2.600 | 24 | 40.366 |
25 | 705000000 | 256QAM | 2.700 | 25 | 40.366 |
26 | 711000000 | 256QAM | 2.200 | 26 | 40.366 |
27 | 717000000 | 256QAM | 2.800 | 27 | 40.366 |
28 | 723000000 | 256QAM | 2.700 | 28 | 40.366 |
29 | 825000000 | 256QAM | 0.800 | 29 | 38.983 |
30 | 831000000 | 256QAM | 0.600 | 30 | 38.983 |
31 | 837000000 | 256QAM | 0.200 | 31 | 40.366 |
32 | 843000000 | 256QAM | 0.200 | 32 | 38.605 |
Receiver | FFT type | Subcarr 0 Frequency(MHz) | PLC locked | NCP locked | MDC1 locked | PLC power(dBmv) |
0 | NA | NA | NO | NO | NO | NA |
1 | 4K | 275600000 | YES | YES | YES | 3.700001 |
Port ID | Frequency (MHz) | Modulation | Signal strength (dBmV) | Channel ID | Bandwidth |
1 | 30596000 | ATDMA - 64QAM | 33.500 | 1 | 6400000 |
2 | 38595824 | ATDMA - 64QAM | 37.250 | 3 | 3200000 |
3 | 23700000 | ATDMA - 64QAM | 32.750 | 2 | 6400000 |
Channel Index | State | lin Digital Att | Digital Att | BW (sc's*fft) | Report Power | Report Power1_6 | FFT Size |
0 | DISABLED | 0.5000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | -inf | -1.0000 | 4K |
1 | DISABLED | 0.5000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | -inf | -1.0000 | 4K |
Thoughts? I am currently at 5Mbps DL / 50Mbps UL on speed test
01-16-2017 07:10 PM - edited 01-16-2017 07:15 PM
@Datalink, in @gbssengo's output, would the downstream frequencies possibly be a contributing factor?
It appears that most modems are operating in the 363-651MHz UHF range, but in @gbssengo's case, the modem is operating well above that, exceeding the 700MHz limit (aka analog TV ch 51-69), and in particular, exceeding the 806MHz limit of analog TV.
These results look anomalous;
Downstream Overview
Port ID Frequency (MHz) Modulation Signal strength (dBmV) Channel ID Signal noise ratio (dB) 25 705000000 256QAM 2.700 25 40.366 26 711000000 256QAM 2.200 26 40.366 27 717000000 256QAM 2.800 27 40.366 28 723000000 256QAM 2.700 28 40.366 29 825000000 256QAM 0.800 29 38.983 30 831000000 256QAM 0.600 30 38.983 31 837000000 256QAM 0.200 31 40.366 32 843000000 256QAM 0.200 32 38.605
Could it possibly be outside interference at these frequencies?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/700_MHz_auction_in_Canada
01-16-2017 08:18 PM
them stringing you along with no fix after all this time is another way of them telling you they just don't know how to fix your issue. I suggest you do what I'm about to do and just make the decision you're contemplating on making.
01-16-2017 09:36 PM - edited 01-16-2017 10:01 PM
@gp-se wrote:I have a WD My Cloud, I also cannot connect to my NAS using Windows Wifi, my MacBook Pro however will connect using Wifi without issue, however I think it's connecting with AFP instead of SMB. My PS4 Pro using LAN cable can connect to the NAS without issue. So it looks like a SMB Wifi issue.
@gp-se wrote:
@gp-se wrote:I have a WD My Cloud, I also cannot connect to my NAS using Windows Wifi, my MacBook Pro however will connect using Wifi without issue, however I think it's connecting with AFP instead of SMB. My PS4 Pro using LAN cable can connect to the NAS without issue. So it looks like a SMB Wifi issue.
Just an update, I set my MacBook Pro to connect using SMB over WiFi, and I couldn't connect. So this issue is Operating System Indipendant. When I connect using AFP over WiFi it will connect, just no SMB over WiFi. Using my PS4 Pro over LAN I can connect to SMB. Does anyone know if the .20 firmware corrects this? I'm on Network Wide Release .19
how did you connect to your Samba share with the ps4?
01-16-2017 11:40 PM
01-16-2017 11:45 PM
@asharahmed wrote:
In the markham berczy area, using the original, going to swap out for the new one tomorrow. running .20. yes im in bridged. no DOCSIS 3.1 here yet.
Why would you swap modems (sounds like you are using the CODA-4582) if everything is working great?
What router are you using?
What about your downstream overview, can you share that?
01-17-2017 11:20 AM - edited 01-17-2017 11:21 AM
I've been very happy with the new modem.
I switched back to Rogers from TS for the 250/20 on Dec 16th and started with a used CGN3ACR (had a CDA3 with TS). It was problematic from the beginning, speeds were up and down hour to hour and day to day. It would also lose connectivity multiple times a day. This was in bridge mode.
After finding out about the new modem I swapped it out for the CODA-4582. Had to fight for it because the Rogers CS wanted to charge me more. She had to call retention to get it added without an increase in cost.
Anyhow, it’s been running perfect ever since. Started with .13 and it was updated to .19 the next day and still at .19.
It’s in bridge mode connected to my Sophos UTM and is my primary connection to my TS DSL line. Rock solid with multiple speeds tests and Netflix streams running at the same time.
This speedtest was with QoS and IPS turned off.
01-17-2017 11:31 AM
Just ran this from my desktop which isn't directly connected (basement to my 3rd floor office).
CODA-4582->Sophos UTM->Netgear Switch->ActionTech Bonded MOCA 2 Adapters->Netgear Switch->Desktop
01-17-2017 11:41 AM
01-17-2017 12:26 PM
This thread makes it look like a lemon of a modem but remember most people only post when they have problems not when thngs are going great.
I'm willing to wager most people are not having issues. My neighbor switched the same day I did and hasn't had any issues either.
I'm downtown east side, tail end of Riverdale.
01-17-2017 12:33 PM - edited 01-17-2017 12:49 PM
01-17-2017 01:54 PM - edited 01-17-2017 01:57 PM
@lethalsniper wrote:
Thanks. Can I get this modem if I'm on ignite 250 and is there a extra fee per month hope not.
Yes no problem with the 250/20 plan as I have it and there are no modem charges with the Ignite plans! Make sure you ask for the CODA-4582 with the Black Dot on the Box and on the Modem.
01-17-2017 06:00 PM
01-17-2017 06:03 PM
Gateway Mode - 192.168.0.1
Bridge Mode - 192.168.100.1
01-17-2017 06:17 PM
01-17-2017 06:47 PM
01-17-2017 07:37 PM
Modems with the black dot close to the power cord have additional shield installed over the Docsis tuner for EMI protection. That Docsis tuner is probably this one:
01-17-2017 07:49 PM
@gbssengo, from what I can tell, the signal levels you posted yesterday are ok:
The only questions I would have would be for @RogersDave and those concern the frequencies above 800 Mhz, which are slightly lower is received power levels (not much), and the power level for the OFDM channels as I don't know what the acceptable range is for those two channels. There is no apparent reason for the slow data rates from what I can see, hopefully Dave can comment on them.
Are you running the 2.4 Ghz wifi by any chance? If so, can you try disabling the 2.4 Ghz wifi and run a wired speedtest to see if there is any change?
01-17-2017 07:49 PM
@Datalink wrote:Modems with the black dot close to the power cord have additional shield installed over the Docsis tuner for EMI protection. That Docsis tuner is probably this one:
This is why I was asking if the FCC ID changed on the black dot verion, or the p/n, as the original CODA-4582 is using the mxl278
Since there was no change, it appears that the extra shielding was either applied as a rework at the distributor, or at a Rogers distribution centre.
01-17-2017 08:01 PM
01-17-2017 08:05 PM - edited 01-17-2017 08:12 PM
Does the modem actually use the MXL277 downstream DOCSIS tuner? From the internal photos of the modem on the FCCID website, it shows that it uses the MXL278. However I'm not really sure because the internal photos show the black color of the modem. Interestingly enough, in some of the other photos they show that they were testing the white Rogers version shown by the Rogers logo at the top of the modem.
However, I'm assuming that they put the shielding over the whole unit (which includes both downstream and upstream tuners)? Maybe @RogersDave knows.
BTW, the FCCID is 2AHKM-CODA4782. HOWEVER, this FCCID applies to 4 versions of the modem stated by the Model Difference Declaration Letter.