05-31-2016 08:42 AM - last edited on 03-14-2018 04:23 PM by RogersRoland
Hello Community,
We are currently offering our users an exclusive opportunity to participate in an upcoming trial of the new firmware for our Rocket Wi-Fi Modem (CGN3ACR, CGN3AMR and CGN3ACSMR) and Rocket Gigabit Wi-Fi Modem (CGN3552 and CODA-4582). For details of this program, please see this thread.
This thread will be used for feedback regarding the firmware. We've invited @RogersSergio, @RogersSyd & @RogersBob from our Networking team to participate in this thread. Your feedback is very valuable and will be used to enhance the firmware before it is released publicly.
Thank you for your continued feedback and support.
05-14-2017 12:12 PM
Really feded up with Rogers,!
1, No long time ago updated the Router :CGNM-3552 ; Software from the 4.5.8.22. to 4.5.8.27
2, I'm on the 250/20
3.Time by time the Rogers feed not stable ? Distance from Toronto just 50Km or to much load here in myare in Oshawa, On, or have bad connetions or something else ?
Todays reading on may,14,2017
05-14-2017 06:41 PM
@dere61 Can you log into the modem and goto the DOCSIS WAN page and post your signal levels. Have you tried calling Rogers tech support and explain to them you are not getting the speeds you're paying for?
05-14-2017 09:40 PM
05-15-2017 03:03 PM
@lethalsniper wrote:
What Happ to @RogersDave he hasn't been for quite some time now , is there any new firmware being released any time soon. For the cgn modems like the rocket ?
I'm trying hard on this one. We have a firmware but it causes issues with WiFi. We are working with Hitron to get another spin but it takes time because we need to reproduce the failure in our lab consistently (which is not the case) to collect the required logs.
Dave
05-15-2017 03:16 PM - edited 05-15-2017 03:16 PM
I don't use internal CGN WiFi and have no intention to enable it.
If the only issue with the new firmware is the WIFI , can I get it on my modem @RogersDave?
05-15-2017 05:16 PM - edited 05-15-2017 05:18 PM
@RogersDave wrote:I'm trying hard on this one. We have a firmware but it causes issues with WiFi. We are working with Hitron to get another spin but it takes time because we need to reproduce the failure in our lab consistently (which is not the case) to collect the required logs.
I'd like to test the new firmware too.
05-16-2017 07:05 AM
@mrq wrote:I don't use internal CGN WiFi and have no intention to enable it.
If the only issue with the new firmware is the WIFI , can I get it on my modem @RogersDave?
Not a problem, I pushed it to your modem (it will take 15-20 minutes to download).
Dave
05-16-2017 07:09 AM
@OL1v3r wrote:
@RogersDave wrote:I'm trying hard on this one. We have a firmware but it causes issues with WiFi. We are working with Hitron to get another spin but it takes time because we need to reproduce the failure in our lab consistently (which is not the case) to collect the required logs.
I'd like to test the new firmware too.
@OL1v3r, you currently have the latest firmware on the CODA-4582: 2.0.10.27.
The firmware that @mrq was mentionning is for Hitron AC series (CGN3ACSMR and CGNM-3552) and is firmware 4.5.8.30. You can check all the firmware versions and all the devices on which they are applicable in this post.
Dave
05-16-2017 08:11 AM
Hi @RogersDave, could you please push the .27 to my modem. I did a reset and forgot that it reverts back to 26t2. Thanks!
05-16-2017 11:39 AM
4.5.8.30 on CGN has been good so far.
I get close to full speed on my router ( taking into account it is in use and I have QOS enabled ).
admin@RT-N66U:/tmp/mnt/My_Passport/asusware# python2 speedtest.py --no-pre-allocate
Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
Testing from Rogers (99.250.10X.XXX)...
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Selecting best server based on ping...
Hosted by TekSavvy Solutions (Toronto, ON) [24.13 km]: 41.185 ms
Testing download speed................................................................................
Download: 51.76 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed................................................................................................
Upload: 7.71 Mbit/s
Ping results are less fluctuating , this is the first time ever I see <10ms from Google.
--- google.com ping statistics ---
343 packets transmitted, 343 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 8.740/19.001/91.712 ms
Ping to my modem is mostly within 2 ms:
--- 192.168.100.1 ping statistics ---
118 packets transmitted, 118 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 1.348/2.142/20.900 ms
05-16-2017 04:58 PM
I'm in the trial but my firmware on the coda is 26t2, any way to get pushed to .27?
05-16-2017 05:08 PM
@user12343543 can you send a pm to @CommunityHelps with your modem MAC address just to ensure that they have the correct MAC address. Indicate that you should be at .27 instead of .26T2
05-16-2017 07:28 PM
Hi @RogersDave,
I followed the technical support rep's suggestion and factory reset my modem. Would you be able to push it back to 2.0.10.27 please?
Thank you!
Gill
05-24-2017 09:53 AM
On Coda with .27. When I upgraded my service from 100/10 to 250/20 they exchanged my modem for the Coda and ever since I have seen a 30-50% daily increase in my daily usage. My habits haven't changed (browsing, email, etc) and number of devices connected hasn't changed. I have a couple direct connect Windows PCs and a tablet and phone via wireless, but looking at usage statistics on them the 12-14G / day that the coda is showing doesn't match up. Is there anything I can use that will show me where this extra usage is coming from? I have confirmed that there are no spurious wireless connections etc
thanks
murray
05-25-2017 11:56 AM
just signed up for the trial. reset my modem took few mins to get it going with the new firmware but did speed tests everything is the same and my latency dropped from 10ms to 5ms and my jitter 3ms from about 8. so far so good.
05-30-2017 06:44 PM
Hi, this is concerning the CGN3ACSMR modem I've had for over a year now.
Maybe about Friday last week, my upload speeds have dramatically become null for some reason. I've seen no new firmware from my modem, download is exactly the same but my upload has fallen tremendously.
For reference here is my overviews.
Port ID | Frequency (MHz) | Modulation | Signal strength (dBmV) | Channel ID | Signal noise ratio (dB) |
1 | 693000000 | 256QAM | -10.000 | 23 | 37.356 |
2 | 579000000 | 256QAM | -5.700 | 5 | 40.366 |
3 | 585000000 | 256QAM | -6.000 | 6 | 38.983 |
4 | 591000000 | 256QAM | -6.400 | 7 | 40.366 |
5 | 597000000 | 256QAM | -7.400 | 8 | 39.855 |
6 | 603000000 | 256QAM | -7.500 | 9 | 38.983 |
7 | 609000000 | 256QAM | -7.100 | 10 | 38.983 |
8 | 615000000 | 256QAM | -7.700 | 11 | 38.605 |
9 | 621000000 | 256QAM | -8.000 | 12 | 38.983 |
10 | 633000000 | 256QAM | -7.300 | 13 | 38.983 |
11 | 639000000 | 256QAM | -7.400 | 14 | 38.605 |
12 | 645000000 | 256QAM | -7.800 | 15 | 38.983 |
13 | 651000000 | 256QAM | -8.100 | 16 | 38.983 |
14 | 657000000 | 256QAM | -8.600 | 17 | 38.605 |
15 | 663000000 | 256QAM | -8.400 | 18 | 38.605 |
16 | 669000000 | 256QAM | -8.500 | 19 | 37.636 |
17 | 675000000 | 256QAM | -8.800 | 20 | 37.356 |
18 | 681000000 | 256QAM | -8.900 | 21 | 38.605 |
19 | 687000000 | 256QAM | -9.500 | 22 | 37.636 |
20 | 303000000 | 256QAM | -1.400 | 1 | 40.366 |
21 | 699000000 | 256QAM | -10.600 | 24 | 36.387 |
22 | 705000000 | 256QAM | -10.900 | 25 | 36.387 |
23 | 711000000 | 256QAM | -10.900 | 26 | 36.610 |
24 | 717000000 | 256QAM | -11.200 | 27 | 36.387 |
Port ID | Frequency (MHz) | Modulation | Signal strength (dBmV) | Channel ID | Bandwidth |
1 | 23700000 | ATDMA - 64QAM | 35.500 | 2 | 6400000 |
2 | 38596000 | ATDMA - 64QAM | 36.000 | 3 | 3200000 |
3 | 30596000 | ATDMA - 64QAM | 35.500 | 1 | 6400000 |
Is it because I'm on the 100u plan? Are you guys phasing that out? I see you guys have the new 150u one. I don't understand, I was reliably getting 9-10Mb upload a week ago while in Bridge mode with a Netgear R7000. It is now not even reaching 5Mb... I've factory reset both my modem and my router, tested speeds through 7 different sites, no upload result has peaked above 5, yet my download are all in line with my plan. Anything you can shed some light on? Thanks in advance.
05-30-2017 07:12 PM
@WBarras call tech support and ask the CSR to run a signal check on the modem. It might pass, but I doubt it. All of your downstream levels are low, the signal to noise levels are ok, as are the upstream levels. Let the CSR about the low upload speeds and any other issues that you might have with cable tv pixelation or audio dropouts. I would expect the CSR to arrange a tech visit to check out the external cabling and connectors.
06-01-2017 11:31 AM
Very strange. Something obviously happened on May 29th. No usage has dropped dramatically, but house usage pattern and connected devices remains the same. WAN uptime 7+ days, firmware still at .27
06-01-2017 09:38 PM - edited 06-01-2017 09:40 PM
Anyone who is still using a CGN3 modem should upgrade to the new Coda modem, especially if you're in a DOCSIS 3.1 enabled area. While my experience with the Coda modem hasn't been perfect, with the latest .27 firmware, it's noticeably better in every way than my the CGN3 I had.
06-07-2017 12:18 AM
I am still using the CGNM-3552 modem. Can anyone tell me if my signals are good:
Port ID | Frequency (MHz) | Modulation | Signal strength (dBmV) | Channel ID | Signal noise ratio (dB) |
1 | 615000000 | 256QAM | 0.600 | 11 | 38.605 |
2 | 579000000 | 256QAM | 1.800 | 5 | 38.983 |
3 | 585000000 | 256QAM | 0.800 | 6 | 38.983 |
4 | 591000000 | 256QAM | 0.800 | 7 | 38.605 |
5 | 597000000 | 256QAM | 0.600 | 8 | 38.605 |
6 | 603000000 | 256QAM | 0.300 | 9 | 38.605 |
7 | 609000000 | 256QAM | 0.500 | 10 | 37.636 |
8 | 303000000 | 256QAM | 1.200 | 1 | 38.605 |
9 | 621000000 | 256QAM | 1.500 | 12 | 38.605 |
10 | 633000000 | 256QAM | -0.900 | 13 | 37.636 |
11 | 639000000 | 256QAM | 0.700 | 14 | 37.636 |
12 | 645000000 | 256QAM | -0.800 | 15 | 37.636 |
13 | 651000000 | 256QAM | 0.300 | 16 | 38.605 |
14 | 657000000 | 256QAM | -0.300 | 17 | 37.636 |
15 | 663000000 | 256QAM | 0.100 | 18 | 37.356 |
16 | 669000000 | 256QAM | 0.200 | 19 | 37.636 |
17 | 675000000 | 256QAM | -0.600 | 20 | 37.636 |
18 | 681000000 | 256QAM | 1.100 | 21 | 38.605 |
19 | 687000000 | 256QAM | -0.700 | 22 | 38.605 |
20 | 693000000 | 256QAM | -2.100 | 23 | 36.610 |
21 | 699000000 | 256QAM | -1.400 | 24 | 37.356 |
22 | 705000000 | 256QAM | -1.500 | 25 | 37.636 |
23 | 711000000 | 256QAM | 0.400 | 26 | 37.636 |
24 | 717000000 | 256QAM | -1.300 | 27 | 37.356 |
25 | 723000000 | 256QAM | -2.500 | 28 | 37.300 |
26 | 825000000 | 256QAM | -1.400 | 29 | 37.900 |
27 | 831000000 | 256QAM | -2.200 | 30 | 38.200 |
28 | 837000000 | 256QAM | -2.200 | 31 | 38.200 |
29 | 843000000 | 256QAM | -0.700 | 32 | 37.900 |
30 | 849000000 | 256QAM | 0.000 | 2 | 36.900 |
31 | 855000000 | 256QAM | 4.600 | 3 | 38.200 |
32 | 861000000 | 256QAM | 3.800 | 4 | 38.200 |
Port ID | Frequency (MHz) | Modulation | Signal strength (dBmV) | Channel ID | BandWidth |
1 | 30596000 | ATDMA - 64QAM | 40.750 | 4 | 6400000 |
2 | 38596000 | ATDMA - 64QAM | 42.750 | 6 | 3200000 |
3 | 23700000 | ATDMA - 64QAM | 42.000 | 5 | 6400000 |
06-07-2017 12:43 AM - edited 06-07-2017 12:45 AM
Yes, they're ok. I'd like to see a tighter grouping on the downstream, but, they're ok. The uptick on the final two 800 Mhz signal levels is unusual, normally we see those last freqs drop by a large amount, but where they are is fine. The downstream signal to noise ratios are good as are the upstream signal levels.