Here you go:
Ok, so, we have your CODA original, CODA single dot, and now CODA double dot, lol. Whats next?
@tester2013, yes, absolutely request .24 for the new modem. That might be pushed out network wide this week, but I wouldn't wait. That request will also place the modem on the trials modem list, to receive updates down the road prior to network wide release. Usually by the time that the trials modem group receives the latest version, its already undergone testing internally within Rogers and with a smaller external test group. I haven't seen any issues in terms of stability with trial builds. There are quirks that are picked up in testing but the builds are very stable.
Ok, purple LED, then yup, you should request .24 as DOCSIS 3.1 operation will be stable with that build.
Official Production Version is .19....so you'll likely get that pushed later. If you had DOCSIS 3.1 previously on the last CODA then it means the CMTS you're connected to is 3.1 enabled. I hope you're luckier with this one and that it works out for you.
@rjmaxim, saw your post regarding the negative signal levels. That in itself isn't a problem as long as the values aren't down in the gutter at -10 across the board or worse. In your case the levels are a bit odd to say the least. I don't have time right now, but I'll plot the levels and consult with Dave regarding the high frequency roll-off that you have. I suspect a 750 Mhz device somewhere in the signal path, but Dave will have to confirm that. I don't know why that wasn't picked up by either tech 😞
Running the modem cable off of the VOIP port means that there is no amplification which is why the signal levels are down, however, it also means that there won't be any packet loss that can be seen with an amped port connected to an internet modem. The VOIP port is a passive pass-through only.
@Datalink wrote:@rjmaxim, saw your post regarding the negative signal levels. That in itself isn't a problem as long as the values aren't down in the gutter at -10 across the board or worse. In your case the levels are a bit odd to say the least. I don't have time right now, but I'll plot the levels and consult with Dave regarding the high frequency roll-off that you have. I suspect a 750 Mhz device somewhere in the signal path, but Dave will have to confirm that. I don't know why that wasn't picked up by either tech 😞
Running the modem cable off of the VOIP port means that there is no amplification which is why the signal levels are down, however, it also means that there won't be any packet loss that can be seen with an amped port connected to an internet modem. The VOIP port is a passive pass-through only.
@Datalink Thx...for your help. As mentioned previously....Prior to switching my cables on the splitter to the VOIP outlet.....my readings were much better. See below.....Nothing else has changed. I do have a SONOS bridge and my Linksys WRT3200ACM sitting on the same desk....but cannot see them being the culprits. I have asked Dave to run a Node test.....but I know he's overloaded at the moment....so I'll have to a bit more patient.
Cheers...
@rjmaxim wrote:
@Datalink wrote:@rjmaxim, saw your post regarding the negative signal levels. That in itself isn't a problem as long as the values aren't down in the gutter at -10 across the board or worse. In your case the levels are a bit odd to say the least. I don't have time right now, but I'll plot the levels and consult with Dave regarding the high frequency roll-off that you have. I suspect a 750 Mhz device somewhere in the signal path, but Dave will have to confirm that. I don't know why that wasn't picked up by either tech 😞
Running the modem cable off of the VOIP port means that there is no amplification which is why the signal levels are down, however, it also means that there won't be any packet loss that can be seen with an amped port connected to an internet modem. The VOIP port is a passive pass-through only.
@Datalink Thx...for your help. As mentioned previously....Prior to switching my cables on the splitter to the VOIP outlet.....my readings were much better. See below.....Nothing else has changed. I do have a SONOS bridge and my Linksys WRT3200ACM sitting on the same desk....but cannot see them being the culprits. I have asked Dave to run a Node test.....but I know he's overloaded at the moment....so I'll have to a bit more patient.
Cheers...
Forgot the Specs....
Downstream Overview | |||||
Port ID | Frequency (MHz) | Modulation | Signal strength (dBmV) | Channel ID | Signal noise ratio (dB) |
1 | 591000000 | 256QAM | 0.200 | 7 | 36.610 |
2 | 567000000 | 256QAM | -1.400 | 3 | 36.387 |
3 | 573000000 | 256QAM | -0.700 | 4 | 36.610 |
4 | 579000000 | 256QAM | -1.200 | 5 | 36.610 |
5 | 585000000 | 256QAM | -0.900 | 6 | 36.610 |
6 | 561000000 | 256QAM | -2.600 | 2 | 35.973 |
7 | 597000000 | 256QAM | 1.100 | 8 | 37.356 |
8 | 603000000 | 256QAM | 0.800 | 9 | 36.610 |
9 | 609000000 | 256QAM | 0.400 | 10 | 36.610 |
10 | 615000000 | 256QAM | 1.700 | 11 | 36.387 |
11 | 621000000 | 256QAM | 2.400 | 12 | 36.610 |
12 | 633000000 | 256QAM | 2.400 | 13 | 36.610 |
13 | 639000000 | 256QAM | 3.200 | 14 | 36.610 |
14 | 645000000 | 256QAM | 3.100 | 15 | 37.356 |
15 | 651000000 | 256QAM | 3.000 | 16 | 36.610 |
16 | 657000000 | 256QAM | 2.500 | 17 | 36.610 |
17 | 663000000 | 256QAM | 2.300 | 18 | 36.610 |
18 | 669000000 | 256QAM | 2.100 | 19 | 36.610 |
19 | 675000000 | 256QAM | 2.100 | 20 | 36.610 |
20 | 681000000 | 256QAM | 1.600 | 21 | 36.610 |
21 | 687000000 | 256QAM | 0.800 | 22 | 36.387 |
22 | 693000000 | 256QAM | -0.100 | 23 | 36.610 |
23 | 699000000 | 256QAM | 0.100 | 24 | 36.610 |
24 | 705000000 | 256QAM | -0.700 | 25 | 36.387 |
25 | 711000000 | 256QAM | -2.400 | 26 | 35.780 |
26 | 717000000 | 256QAM | -2.800 | 27 | 35.595 |
27 | 723000000 | 256QAM | -2.300 | 28 | 35.780 |
28 | 825000000 | 256QAM | -7.400 | 29 | 33.834 |
29 | 831000000 | 256QAM | -7.300 | 30 | 33.834 |
30 | 837000000 | 256QAM | -6.600 | 31 | 34.346 |
31 | 843000000 | 256QAM | -7.000 | 32 | 34.346 |
32 | 555000000 | 256QAM | -2.600 | 1 | 35.780 |
OFDM Downstream Overview |
| |||||
Receiver | FFT type | Subcarr 0 Frequency(MHz) | PLC locked | NCP locked | MDC1 locked | PLC power(dBmv) |
0 | 4K | 275600000 | YES | YES | YES | -0.099998 |
1 | NA | NA | NO | NO | NO | NA |
-
931920 views
-
669 Likes
-
-
