Just prior to upgrade of modem this morning, here are my results on the Cisco 3825.
After upgrade to the CODA-4582, here are my results to the same server;
I see multiple comments (on various forums) about issues when running WinMTR. I will perform additional testing on this one, trying to understand why it is reporting packet loss.
cmadmin@cmprobe1:~$ mtr -4 -c 50 --report www.google.ca Start: Tue Dec 13 13:53:10 2016 HOST: cmprobe1 Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1.|-- hitronhub.home 0.0% 50 0.7 0.7 0.6 1.5 0.0 2.|-- 99.254.94.1 50.0% 50 10.1 13.0 9.9 24.8 3.9 3.|-- 69.63.243.81 0.0% 50 10.6 14.0 10.5 28.5 3.3 4.|-- 69.63.248.185 0.0% 50 11.5 13.0 10.3 18.1 1.6 5.|-- 209.148.230.14 50.0% 50 11.6 14.5 9.6 59.5 10.0 6.|-- ??? 100.0 50 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.|-- 209.85.242.109 50.0% 50 11.4 15.9 10.5 62.4 11.7 8.|-- 216.239.46.160 36.0% 50 23.7 24.9 22.3 31.5 2.2 9.|-- 72.14.232.163 22.0% 50 26.5 25.8 21.7 39.1 3.8 10.|-- 108.170.243.225 50.0% 50 24.2 24.3 21.7 30.0 1.8 11.|-- 216.239.41.163 50.0% 50 25.2 24.2 22.1 31.2 1.7 12.|-- ord37s07-in-f3.1e100.net 0.0% 50 22.8 23.5 20.8 30.0 1.7 cmadmin@cmprobe1:~$ ping -q -c 50 www.google.ca PING www.google.ca (172.217.1.35) 56(84) bytes of data. --- www.google.ca ping statistics --- 50 packets transmitted, 50 received, 0% packet loss, time 49071ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 21.539/26.931/65.911/8.029 ms
Packet loss is only reported for intermediary nodes, not the final end-point. Same thing with a straight ping that doesn't report any packet loss either.
In any case, I will perform additional testing and report to Hitron accordingly.
Dave
When you have everything set up, reboot it. I found that I had totally miserable results, but, I switched the DNS to OpenDNS and did a reboot after I had killed the wifi. The speedtests wouldn't even run at first go. After that I ended up with 950/40. I've never seen 950 down up to this point. That was using www.speedtest.net Rogers Montreal server. If you want to see fast speeds, don't use the DSLReports speedtest. Use www.speedtest.net and use the Toronto Rogers or Beanfield server, or use the Montreal Rogers or Fibrenoire server.
@lethalsniper wrote:
Will the .28 firmware be released anytime time soon if so will it work as good as the newer modem for gaming or would the newer modem be be still better ? Just don't want to waste time on swapping modems if in the end it's going to be all the same once .28 gets released thanks.
I don't have a date yet for the next firmware iteration. I know it should come soon but because of the holidays, it is possible that I won't receive it until January.
As for comparing the Hitron CGN series with the Hitron CODA series, I think you will be better off with the new modem, especially if you are on a plan of 100u or higher.
@lethalsniper wrote:
Why would I be better off with the newer modem if I'm on 250u care to explain , just want better latency / ping when gaming online that's all I care
The newer modem uses a more recent chipset (the Intel Puma 7). This chipset works better today for latency sensitive applications such as gaming.
At this point, Intel are trying to improve the performance of the existing chipset (Intel Puma 6) in older device. They may be able to bring it to the same level as Puma 7 but there is no guarantee on that.
Furthermore, the CODA-4582 is future proof for our DOCSIS 3.1 deployment which will also bring improvement to your gaming performance while the CGN series are limited to our DOCSIS 3.0 network.
Dave
grr, there's something seriously wrong there.....
Can you try using OpenDNS or Google for the DNS and see if that makes any difference:
OpenDNS:
208.67.222.222
208.67.220.220
8.8.8.8
8.8.4.4
Change the DNS and then reboot the modem. In theory, it shouldn't make a difference, but, one never knows these days....
@SimplePanda wrote:Hi Dave...
Can you clarify a couple of things perhaps?
1. In High Park on the new 4582 I'm getting DOCSIS 3.1 down but not up. As a result I'm speed testing at a solid 940Mbps now (basically, full gigabit accounting for overhead on the ethernet connection to the modem) but still getting inconsistent upload speeds (30-45 Mbps with a lot of fluctuation). Is D3.1 upstream in the cards sooner or later?
DOCSIS 3.1 on the upstream is planned but that will come later. It's not fully supported by most CMTS vendors at this stage but this should come at some point in 2017. When the CMTS software supports it, we will run network tests and deploy it.
2. You had mentioned that there is no IPv6 for the 4582 yet, but I'm definitely getting IPv6 on one of my test devices (Airport Extreme). On the other hand, I can't get a default route on my Ubiquity EdgeMAX so it doesn't seem to work there. Any comments on the inconsitent IPv6 service between them right now?
This is a configuration error. IPv6 is broken in some scenarios on the current software version and it was not supposed to be enabled yet because of that. It will likely be disabled later today or tonight and be re-enabled once we push software version 2.0.10.16 in January.
Overall though, kudos to you and the team. Pings are much more consistnent on this new gateway.
Thanks. I will pass along to the large team of people that worked on this in the past couple of weeks.
@Mythen wrote:
@RogersDave
Any word if other packages can avail of this new modem. I am on 70u package currently. Last time I swapped. They gave me the 3552.
Mythen
This following plans are eligible for the CODA-4582 at this point: Ignite Gigabit, 250u, 100u and 70u (Atlantic only).
-
923264 views
-
669 Likes
-
-
