01-05-2017 11:03 AM - edited 05-02-2017 07:09 AM
*** This post was last edited May 2, 2017 ***
Good morning Community,
As I mentioned in a post two days ago, we have received the next firmware 2.0.10.20 from Hitron. We are currently running initial testing on this version and will push it out to participants in the firmware trial program as soon as it passes initial testing.
However, while running these tests, we discovered abnormal behavior with ICMP and are awaiting feedback from Hitron today to asses how this will be addressed. As soon as I this is confirmed, I’ll update the change log with the correct version information and start pushing it out.
In parallel, we are still working on the following high priority items. In some cases below, I requested affected customers to reach out to me via private message. If you do so, please include your modem MAC address in the subject line (even if we exchange messages daily) as there are a lot of you reaching out to me daily 🙂
UDP Packet Loss
The investigation for what has been reported as UDP packet loss is still ongoing. We have deployed a probe at one fellow forum member on both a CODA-4582 and a CGNM-3552 to collect additional data. We are actively working with Hitron and Intel on the results observed.
Based on what we know so far, in most instances UDP packet loss is coupled with higher uplink usage in the area. Although the impact is noticeable in specific logs (League of Legends), the root cause for the perceivable impact (while playing) is likely related to bufferbloat (see next issue).
Bufferbloat
When comparing the performance of a CODA-4582 to a CGNM-3552 in the same network conditions, the CODA-4582 consistently reports higher bufferbloat when tested on DSLReports.
Update April 12: The solution for this problem will come in two folds. It will require a change in software which will possibly be included in 2.0.10.27 but more likely in 2.0.10.28 and a change in network configuration.
The network configuration change is not compatible with the current firmware so this change will only come after a vast majority of the modems are running the new code. We are however looking at a way to make the change only for specific modems to support testing in the community.
Update April 22: This problem seems resolved in firmware 2.0.10.27
5 GHz WiFi Low range for channels 36 to 48
Lower WiFi channels on the modem have a much smaller range. This is due in part to the limit imposed by Industry Canada to maximum transmit power.
Furthermore, the current automatic channel selection (auto mode) tends to select the lower channels when in similar load conditions.
Workaround: manually select higher channels (149-153-157-161)
Update April 22: The channel selection algorithm has been improved in firmware 2.0.10.27
Loss of OFDM Channel Lock
Under some RF conditions, the modem fails to lock properly on the OFDM channel. This typically result in variable performance.
Update April 12: This problem is resolved in 2.0.10.26T2
List of connected device does not get fully populated
This is a known issue that has been tracked since firmware 2.0.10.13. We are making improvements at every firmware but it is not a perfect system.
The situation is worst after a reboot or firmware upgrade as the list gets reset and must be repopulated as devices renew their DHCP lease.
NAT Loopback not working for wired clients
When setting up port forwarding to an internal server, it is possible for a client on WiFi to reach the server using the external IP/port. If the client is on a wired interface, it doesn't work.
Update April 12: This problem is resolved in 2.0.10.26T2 (not confirmed)
LAN Counters not working
Some customers reported that LAN counters (especially in bridge mode) are reporting inaccurate values.
This problem has been reported to Hitron for investigation.
Unexpected modem reboot
Some customers reported their modem reboots unexpectedly. We have also seen this behavior in our lab.
Update April 12: This problem is resolved in 2.0.10.26T2
Missing SC-QAM Channels
After a reboot, some modems are missing SC-QAM channels. A fix has been implemented in 2.0.10.26T2 to address this behavior but it has not corrected all scenarios.
Investigation continues with Hitron.
WiFi Survey
The WiFi Survey functionality in firmware 2.0.10.26T2 (and possibly before) reports incorrect SSID names.
Guest Network
When connecting to the Guest Network, an error message is displayed "only allow DHCP client to use this wireless". This has been reported in firmware 2.0.10.26T2.
Update April 22: This issue has been resolved in firmware 2.0.10.27
Update May 2: It seems this issue is not fully resolved and still experienced by some users
Future Planned Improvements
The following are items that we are working on in parallel of the above.
Dave
*Edited Labels*
07-14-2017 09:45 AM
@ishine80 do you have anything that is connected via ethernet to one of the ethernet ports at the back of the modem? Does your laptop have an ethernet port that you can use for test purposes? I suspect that you lose all connectivity from the modem, ethernet and wifi, but it would be good to ensure that the ethernet connection would also be affected. All depends on whether or not you can connect to the modem via ethernet.
07-14-2017 09:53 AM
nothing is currently connected by ethernet. I will set up one other laptop we currently do not use regularly and hardwire it to the CODA to see if that as well drops the connection. I won't be able to get back to you with results until much later this evening after my work day.
07-14-2017 09:55 AM
07-14-2017 04:30 PM
Hello Community!
I'm sorry it has been a little while since my last visit (5 full pages in this thread) but as I said previously, from time to time my boss still wants me to do my real job which I have to do if I want to be able to keep said job and support all of you on the side 🙂
That being said, I read all the messages in this tread (will follow up with the other regular threads where I'm active and private messages in the next couple of hours) and picked up a few items for Hitron.
Version 2.0.10.29 and 2.0.10.30T1 were initial test code of a brand new development branch. These firmwares were not as stable as I would have wanted but there was a lot more work done on it in the last 2 weeks. We have 2 new firmwares coming soon with a lot of fixes while will hopefully bring on par with the general stability of 2.0.10.27 along with the new features.
We have also broken down that was original planned in 2.0.10.30T1 in 2 different builds coming between now and the end of July. The first one will include some of the DFS and band steering changes while the second will focus on WiFi speed improvement.
Given the comments in here, I will definitely re-run all my latency tests on these new versions and compare with 2.0.10.27.
@Max24, noted you have a speed issue and will look into it.
@RyzenFX, OFDM loss (I think it's a localized problem). Did you make any progress with this issue?
@ishine80, I understand that you have intermittent connectivity issue. Will wait for the hardwired test to troubleshoot further.
Dave
07-14-2017 05:31 PM - edited 07-14-2017 05:37 PM
@RogersDave Welcome back! 😄
I have made some progress with this issue and I was able to switch modems. Unfortunately this hasn't resolved the issue for me as my modem is still not reporting a lock to an OFDM carrier. I contacted tier 2 customer support and they said that my modem is connected to an OFDM carrier, which is odd considering that my modem interface is still not showing a lock. I'll call again and see if it's a localized issue.
Also, I will compare my League of Legends game logs on .27 to those of .30T1 to see if there is a latency problem in .30T1.
07-14-2017 05:59 PM
Thanks for the update Dave!
By any chance do you have any info on DOCSIS 3.1 upstream deployment?
07-15-2017 03:28 PM
@RogersDave, Just an update since my last posting I had spoken with a supervisor last week July 5th and again on July 7th and was advised that the issue was being investigated on the node and a area ticket had been created should be listed on my account I can provide you the number if need be. The ticket is still being worked on AFAIK however I noticed speeds were restored earlier this week Wednesday, July 12th, not sure what the problem was or is. But my guess is some speed restriction was in effect as sometimes when I ran speedtests prior to July 12th my download would sometimes to 800-900 then instantly drop down to around the 550 range and the upload would sometimes start off at 43-36 then drop down to 1-6mbps.
Since my speeds were restored I've now been having issues with the port speed dropping from gigabit down to 100M and I have to change the ethernet cable to another port to restore the speed back to gigabit (faster than restarting the modem). Not sure what is causing this as I assumed it was fixed in the earlier firmware versions..
07-19-2017 06:42 PM
Finally had some time to get a few things tested. Hooked up my better of the two laptops through ethernet and found ethernet could not connect when my cell phone dropped the wifi signal. Note that at the same time my daughter was still able to stream youtube kids on the old iphone that's not linked to any cell network.
Below is the message on the ethernet through my laptop: it stated there was an unknown network and could not connect to network as a general message.
IPv6 address: fd00:6477:7de2:58f2:a869:fccf:baa2:424
IPv6 DNS Servers: fec0:0:0:ffff::1%1
fec0:0:0:ffff::2%1
fec0:0:0:ffff::3%1
Manufacturer: Realtek
Description: Realtek PCIe FE Family Controller
Driver version: 9.1.406.2015
I will run the other tests that @Datalink suggested later in the evening respond on the same thread.
07-20-2017 08:55 AM
I am having this same issue with the CODA Running .27 FW in bridge mode. Randomly throughout the day or night there will connection issues with high latency and patcket loss and then finally the modem reboots itself. The connection is excellent otherwise until these events happen. I have not contacted support as of yet. Any suggestions prior to doing so would be great. Does the newer .29 FW correct issues like this?
Here is my Docsis log.
N o. | Time | Type | Priority | Event |
1 | 07/20/2017 05:51:52 | 84020200 | warning | Lost MDD Timeout;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
2 | 07/20/2017 06:23:39 | 82000200 | critical | No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
3 | 07/20/2017 06:23:40 | 82000300 | critical | Ranging Request Retries exhausted;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
4 | 07/20/2017 06:23:40 | 82000600 | critical | Unicast Maintenance Ranging attempted - No response - Retries exhausted;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
5 | 07/20/2017 06:28:40 | 82000400 | critical | Received Response to Broadcast Maintenance Request, But no Unicast Maintenance opportunities received - T4 time out;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
6 | 07/20/2017 06:29:04 | 82000200 | critical | No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
7 | 07/20/2017 07:24:18 | 82000400 | critical | Received Response to Broadcast Maintenance Request, But no Unicast Maintenance opportunities received - T4 time out;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
8 | 07/20/2017 07:24:18 | 85010200 | warning | TCS Partial Service;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
9 | 07/20/2017 08:07:48 | 82000400 | critical | Received Response to Broadcast Maintenance Request, But no Unicast Maintenance opportunities received - T4 time out;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
10 | 07/20/2017 08:08:18 | 82000200 | critical | No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
11 | 07/20/2017 08:08:18 | 82000300 | critical | Ranging Request Retries exhausted;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
12 | 07/20/2017 08:08:18 | 82000600 | critical | Unicast Maintenance Ranging attempted - No response - Retries exhausted;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
13 | 07/20/2017 08:08:18 | 82000400 | critical | Received Response to Broadcast Maintenance Request, But no Unicast Maintenance opportunities received - T4 time out;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
14 | 07/20/2017 08:08:22 | 82000200 | critical | No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
15 | 07/20/2017 08:08:23 | 82000300 | critical | Ranging Request Retries exhausted;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
16 | 07/20/2017 08:08:23 | 82000600 | critical | Unicast Maintenance Ranging attempted - No response - Retries exhausted;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
17 | 07/20/2017 08:08:43 | 82000200 | critical | No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
18 | 07/20/2017 08:09:01 | 90000000 | warning | MIMO Event MIMO: Stored MIMO=-1 post cfg file MIMO=-1;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
19 | 07/20/2017 08:09:04 | 84000700 | warning | RCS Partial Service;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
20 | 07/20/2017 09:57:52 | 82000200 | critical | No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=x:x:x:x:x:x;CMTS-MAC=00:17:10:93:b3:0e;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
Here is my Docsis WAN signals:
OFDM Downstream Overview |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receiver | FFT type | Subcarr 0 Frequency(MHz) | PLC locked | NCP locked | MDC1 locked | PLC power(dBmv) |
0 | NA | NA | NO | NO | NO | NA |
1 | 4K | 290600000 | YES | YES | YES | -0.500000 |
Downstream Overview |
|
|
|
|
|
Port ID | Frequency (MHz) | Modulation | Signal strength (dBmV) | Channel ID | Signal noise ratio (dB) |
1 | 639000000 | 256QAM | 2.500 | 14 | 35.084 |
2 | 849000000 | 256QAM | 3.100 | 2 | 34.484 |
3 | 855000000 | 256QAM | 3.200 | 3 | 34.926 |
4 | 861000000 | 256QAM | 2.500 | 4 | 34.346 |
5 | 579000000 | 256QAM | 1.500 | 5 | 35.084 |
6 | 585000000 | 256QAM | 1.700 | 6 | 35.084 |
8 | 597000000 | 256QAM | 2.200 | 8 | 35.595 |
9 | 603000000 | 256QAM | 2.000 | 9 | 35.595 |
10 | 609000000 | 256QAM | 2.000 | 10 | 35.084 |
11 | 615000000 | 256QAM | 1.800 | 11 | 35.084 |
12 | 621000000 | 256QAM | 1.700 | 12 | 34.926 |
13 | 633000000 | 256QAM | 2.400 | 13 | 35.084 |
14 | 303000000 | 256QAM | -1.700 | 1 | 35.595 |
15 | 645000000 | 256QAM | 2.000 | 15 | 34.926 |
16 | 651000000 | 256QAM | 2.000 | 16 | 35.084 |
17 | 657000000 | 256QAM | 2.300 | 17 | 35.084 |
18 | 663000000 | 256QAM | 2.500 | 18 | 35.084 |
19 | 669000000 | 256QAM | 3.000 | 19 | 35.595 |
20 | 675000000 | 256QAM | 2.600 | 20 | 35.084 |
21 | 681000000 | 256QAM | 2.300 | 21 | 35.084 |
22 | 687000000 | 256QAM | 2.600 | 22 | 35.084 |
23 | 693000000 | 256QAM | 2.700 | 23 | 35.084 |
24 | 699000000 | 256QAM | 3.000 | 24 | 35.084 |
25 | 705000000 | 256QAM | 3.200 | 25 | 35.084 |
26 | 711000000 | 256QAM | 3.100 | 26 | 35.595 |
27 | 717000000 | 256QAM | 3.000 | 27 | 35.084 |
28 | 723000000 | 256QAM | 3.100 | 28 | 35.084 |
29 | 825000000 | 256QAM | 3.100 | 29 | 34.484 |
30 | 831000000 | 256QAM | 2.800 | 30 | 34.484 |
31 | 837000000 | 256QAM | 2.900 | 31 | 34.484 |
32 | 843000000 | 256QAM | 2.700 | 32 | 34.926 |
Upstream Overview |
|
|
|
|
|
Port ID | Frequency (MHz) | Modulation | Signal strength (dBmV) | Channel ID | Bandwidth |
1 | 30596000 | ATDMA - 64QAM | 42.750 | 1 | 6400000 |
2 | 38595805 | ATDMA - 64QAM | 47.250 | 3 | 3200000 |
3 | 23700000 | ATDMA - 64QAM | 41.500 | 2 | 6400000 |
OFDM/OFDMA Overview |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Channel Index | State | lin Digital Att | Digital Att | BW (sc's*fft) | Report Power | Report Power1_6 | FFT Size |
0 | DISABLED | 0.5000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | -inf | -1.0000 | 4K |
1 | DISABLED | 0.5000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | -inf | -1.0000 | 4K |
07-20-2017 09:49 AM
The Rogers Conference was at 8:00 AM ET today, have you heard any announcement about a new gateway or the deployment of D3.1 Upstream?
07-20-2017 11:25 AM - edited 07-20-2017 11:25 AM
@JohnBeaudin wrote:
The Rogers Conference was at 8:00 AM ET today, have you heard any announcement about a new gateway or the deployment of D3.1 Upstream?
They better hurry up. Bell came a month ago to install fibre right into my suite. Says that in about 3-4 months they'll be lighting up the building and offering enticing Gigabit (940/100) plans to get people onboard, around or slightly lower than the same price as Rogers' special pricing plans.
07-20-2017 12:26 PM
Been experiencing this the past 7-8 weeks. Much much longer than prior FW transitions, and now very inconvenient.
1. Modem constantly reboots knocking out my OBI VOIP ATA
2. WIFI signal interrupts while modem LEDs lit up, knocking out phones and tablets
3. WIFI signal reach reduced. Used to easily reach end of backyard ~25-30 metres. Now it struggles just outside the back door.
Last night was THE WORST episode. Streaming was interrupted every 5-10 minutes.
I'm on .29 FW. But this was an issue when I saw .27. I cannot recall the last stable version #.
Speedtest used to indicate near 900 +/- originally. Now, just approaches 500 but more often in the 250-350 range. Between "EVENTS" all runs well.
I've gone back several pages and see I'm not alone. Very similar DOCSIS logs.
Any assistance/direction before I return the CODA?
Thanks
07-20-2017 07:58 PM
@nobs2016 for the WiFi range issue, make sure you set the 5Ghz to the higher channels (149+) and set 2.4Ghz to either 1, 6, or 11.
07-20-2017 10:20 PM
@gp-se my LAN shows 23 hours up time and WAN is at 17 hours.
My 2.4 is set at AUTO (1) and 5 is at AUTO (161). when I check wireless clients the 2.4's are using 1 and the 5's are using 161. Would there be more stability in selecting channel 1, 6 or 11 specifically for 2.4 and channel option 149-153-157-161 in the 5GHz?
If we get through the night without interruption I will check wifi range tomorrow. Or I'll exchange the modem.
07-21-2017 12:23 AM - edited 07-21-2017 12:26 AM
I used WifiInfo View but neither of my laptops show me 5g connection. I believe they are to old to handle it. Below is the info you wanted less the mac addresses. What do I do now? Note that when my one laptop was ethernet cable connected and the wifi went down it actually would not allow me to connect to the net even through the wifi on my daughters cell which is not connected to a cell network was still streaming youtube kids app.
Should i use my cell 5g connection to scan the wifi channels and post that as well? Please confirm. ty.
SSID | PHY Type | RSSI | Signal Quality | Average Signal Quality | Frequency | Channel | Information Size | Elements Count | Company | Router Model | Router Name | Security | Cipher | Maximum Speed | Channel Width | Channels Range | BSS Type | WPS Support | First Detection | Last Detection | Detection Count | Start Time | Minimum Signal Quality | Maximum Signal Quality | 802.11 Standards | Connected |
802.11g/n | -87 | 21 | 17 | 2.462 | 11 | 191 | 14 | Hitron Technologies. Inc | WPA-PSK + WPA2-PSK | TKIP+CCMP | 216 Mbps | 20 MHz | 13-Sep | Infrastructure | No | 2017-07-20 23:52 | 2017-07-21 0:06 | 7 | 2017-07-08 5:55 | 15 | 21 | 802.11d/i | No | |||
802.11g/n | -87 | 21 | 20.7 | 2.412 | 1 | 191 | 14 | Hitron Technologies. Inc | WPA-PSK + WPA2-PSK | TKIP+CCMP | 216 Mbps | 20 MHz | 03-Jan | Infrastructure | No | 2017-07-20 23:52 | 2017-07-21 0:10 | 43 | 2017-06-03 21:36 | 16 | 30 | 802.11d/i | No | |||
802.11g/n | -84 | 26 | 21.7 | 2.437 | 6 | 191 | 14 | Hitron Technologies. Inc | WPA-PSK + WPA2-PSK | TKIP+CCMP | 216 Mbps | 20 MHz | 08-Apr | Infrastructure | No | 2017-07-20 23:53 | 2017-07-21 0:00 | 12 | 2017-07-17 20:10 | 16 | 36 | 802.11d/i | No | |||
802.11g/n | -87 | 21 | 22.7 | 2.437 | 6 | 191 | 14 | Hitron Technologies. Inc | WPA-PSK + WPA2-PSK | TKIP+CCMP | 216 Mbps | 20 MHz | 08-Apr | Infrastructure | No | 2017-07-20 23:53 | 2017-07-21 0:02 | 9 | 2017-05-18 9:05 | 18 | 36 | 802.11d/i | No | |||
BELL187 | 802.11g/n | -78 | 36 | 34.8 | 2.462 | 11 | 377 | 16 | Sagemcom Broadband SAS | Sagemcom5250_Bell | Sagemcom5250_Bell-NQS1 | WPA2-PSK | CCMP | 216 Mbps | 20 MHz | 13-Sep | Infrastructure | Configured | 2017-07-20 23:52 | 2017-07-21 0:10 | 991 | 2017-07-10 21:58 | 25 | 43 | 802.11d/i | No |
BELL287 | 802.11g/n | -87 | 21 | 23.1 | 2.437 | 6 | 345 | 14 | Sagemcom Broadband SAS | Sagemcom5250_Bell | Sagemcom5250_Bell-NQS1 | WPA2-PSK | CCMP | 216 Mbps | 20 MHz | 08-Apr | Infrastructure | Configured | 2017-07-20 23:52 | 2017-07-21 0:02 | 9 | 2017-07-21 0:02 | 20 | 35 | 802.11d/i | No |
Bella71 | 802.11g/n | -86 | 23 | 19.5 | 2.437 | 6 | 394 | 16 | Hitron Technologies. Inc | APxx | HitronAP | WPA-PSK + WPA2-PSK | TKIP+CCMP | 216 Mbps | 20 MHz | 08-Apr | Infrastructure | Locked | 2017-07-20 23:52 | 2017-07-20 23:59 | 59 | 2017-05-18 9:05 | 15 | 38 | 802.11d/i | No |
Dave$ave | 802.11g/n | -45 | 99 | 98.9 | 2.437 | 6 | 167 | 13 | WPA2-PSK | CCMP | 450 Mbps | 40 MHz | 12-Apr | Infrastructure | No | 2017-07-20 23:52 | 2017-07-21 0:10 | 1059 | 2017-07-20 23:59 | 85 | 99 | 802.11d/i | Yes | |||
Dave$ave_Ext | 802.11g/n | -77 | 38 | 46.6 | 2.437 | 6 | 445 | 17 | Belkin International Inc. | Linksys RE6500 | Linksys Range Extender | WPA-PSK + WPA2-PSK | TKIP+CCMP | 300 Mbps | 40 MHz | 12-Apr | Infrastructure | Configured | 2017-07-20 23:52 | 2017-07-21 0:10 | 1034 | 2017-07-21 0:00 | 26 | 71 | 802.11i/k | No |
DIRECT-7E-HP Officejet 5740 | 802.11g/n | -84 | 26 | 26.1 | 2.437 | 6 | 478 | 15 | Hewlett Packard | 0 | DIRECT-7E-HP Officejet 5740 | WPA2-PSK | CCMP | 72 Mbps | 20 MHz | 08-Apr | Infrastructure | Locked | 2017-07-20 23:52 | 2017-07-21 0:10 | 409 | 2017-06-13 21:46 | 20 | 38 | 802.11h/i | No |
DIRECT-A5-HP OfficeJet Pro 8710 | 802.11g/n | -87 | 21 | 21.9 | 2.462 | 11 | 429 | 14 | Hewlett Packard | 0 | DIRECT-A5-HP OfficeJet Pro 8710 | WPA2-PSK | CCMP | 72 Mbps | 20 MHz | 13-Sep | Infrastructure | Locked | 2017-07-20 23:52 | 2017-07-21 0:10 | 55 | 2017-06-12 9:46 | 18 | 30 | 802.11h/i | No |
f@mily | 802.11g/n/ac | -84 | 26 | 25.5 | 2.462 | 11 | 397 | 18 | Belkin International Inc. | EA8500 | Linksys17092 | WPA2-PSK | CCMP | 1733 Mbps | 40 MHz | 13-May | Infrastructure | Configured | 2017-07-20 23:52 | 2017-07-21 0:10 | 142 | 2017-07-01 17:27 | 18 | 35 | 802.11i | No |
MAHOUSE | 802.11g/n | -90 | 16 | 17 | 2.462 | 11 | 234 | 15 | Hitron Technologies. Inc | WPA-PSK + WPA2-PSK | TKIP+CCMP | 216 Mbps | 20 MHz | 13-Sep | Infrastructure | Locked | 2017-07-20 23:54 | 2017-07-20 23:54 | 2 | 2017-05-24 2:44 | 16 | 18 | 802.11d/i | No | ||
Rogers12345 | 802.11g/n | -89 | 18 | 19 | 2.462 | 11 | 238 | 15 | Hitron Technologies. Inc | WPA-PSK + WPA2-PSK | TKIP+CCMP | 216 Mbps | 20 MHz | 13-Sep | Infrastructure | Locked | 2017-07-20 23:52 | 2017-07-20 23:57 | 2 | 2017-07-08 5:55 | 18 | 20 | 802.11d/i | No | ||
RogersC9563 | 802.11g/n | -89 | 18 | 20.4 | 2.412 | 1 | 238 | 15 | Hitron Technologies. Inc | WPA-PSK + WPA2-PSK | TKIP+CCMP | 216 Mbps | 20 MHz | 03-Jan | Infrastructure | Locked | 2017-07-20 23:53 | 2017-07-21 0:10 | 48 | 2017-06-03 21:36 | 15 | 28 | 802.11d/i | No | ||
WestHam1 | 802.11g/n | -84 | 26 | 26.5 | 2.437 | 6 | 235 | 15 | Hitron Technologies. Inc | WPA-PSK + WPA2-PSK | TKIP+CCMP | 216 Mbps | 20 MHz | 08-Apr | Infrastructure | Locked | 2017-07-20 23:52 | 2017-07-21 0:01 | 8 | 2017-07-17 20:10 | 16 | 38 | 802.11d/i | No |
07-21-2017 10:32 AM - last edited on 07-21-2017 10:45 AM by RogersZia
Hi,
I have Asus RT-68U Router and it works fine with Bell modem. I am new to Rogers cable and the modem Coda-4582. I have disabled the Gateway Resident to switch it to bridge mode. It works fine from the inside. But my VPN on the Asus does not work. I can't connect to my ASUS from outside. It must be the Rogers modem. Could someone please shed me a light? thanks.
07-21-2017 10:59 AM - edited 07-21-2017 11:07 AM
@Raptor2148, personal opinion, I'd recommend running a factory reset on the router. That usually clears up problems when you switch modems from one ISP to another ISP. Also look at your DNS settings in the router. If you happened to have Bell's DNS set in the router, you might want to switch them for Rogers (leave the fields empty) or use Google or OpenDNS for example.
Can you also log into the modem and confirm which firmware version is loaded? Its listed as the Software Version on the Status page. That page comes up automatically when you log into the modem.
Also take note, Bell does not use IPV6. Rogers uses Native IPV6, so, if you happened to have IPV6 enabled in your router, using anything other than Native IPV6, you will have to reset the IPV6 type and change the remaining settings. Here are the IPV6 settings for the 68U, which I also run:
Connection type NATIVE
DHCP-PD Enable
IPv6 LAN Setting
LAN IPv6 Address No entry this will fill in on its own after a router reboot where the router negotiates
with the CMTS.
LAN Prefix Length No entry this will fill in on its own after a router reboot where the router negotiates
with the CMTS.
LAN IPv6 Prefix No entry this will fill in on its own after a router reboot where the router negotiates
with the CMTS.
Auto Configuration Setting Stateless / Stateful I've tested both in the past and prefer to run stateful
as it offers more protection for IPV6 operations
IPv6 DNS Setting
Connect to DNS Server automatically Disable If this is enabled the router and connected devices
will use Rogers IPV6 DNS
IPv6 DNS Server 1 2620:0:ccc::2 (OpenDNS)
IPv6 DNS Server 2 2620:0:ccd::2 (OpenDNS)
IPv6 DNS Server 3 2001:4860:4860:0:0:0:0:8888 (Google)
Auto Configuration Setting
Enable Router Advertisement Enable
07-21-2017 11:15 AM
@ishine80 can you tell me which SSID is yours? When the ethernet and wifi goes down on the modem, you shouldn't be able to stream video on that other cell phone unless that phone is only using IPV4 for example, or, if the phone is connected to someone else's open wifi network. The fact that you lose the ethernet connections should indicate that the modem can't supply either ethernet or wifi networks. That's my current thinking about this. The only other possibility is that this is an IPV4/IPV6 issue, but, I'll have to reread your previous comments to see if you have IPV6 disabled. If so, then this is a modem to CMTS connection issue.
07-21-2017 11:43 AM - edited 07-21-2017 12:00 PM
Hi @Datalink
SSID is Dave$ave. Unfortunately not at home to confirm if I've got IPV6 disabled. I can verify this evening. What does it mean when you say the issue could be a modem to CMTS connection issue? Our neighbours and the school board wifi are all occupying channels 1 and 6. Later on in the evening while I was trying to play around for the tests my husbands phone and laptops were connected but I was not able to connect to wifi on my phone. Am I understanding the situation correctly that there's so many people from rogers in my area trying to make connections with Rogers that individuals are being literally kicked off the connections to accommodate the load? IF this is the case then firmware on a modem will not correct it will it? Also is it possible to have a technician finally come to check things and out confirm what we need confirmed? I'm getting to a point of not understanding on these issues.
07-21-2017 11:46 AM
Thank you.
07-21-2017 01:51 PM
Community,
Quick update for everybody. I just pushed code 2.0.10.31 to some of you. Based on feedback, I will continue deployment in the coming days (and will resume firmware upgrades for new participants as well).
Code 2.0.10.31 on CODA is the same as 2.0.10.29 with the following changes:
Dave