In 2014, expanded their network with the rebranding of TSN to TSN1, and the introduction of TSN3, 4, and 5. Since that time, you've identified these channels as follows on your network:
494: TSN1H
495: TSN2H
496: TSN3H
497: TSN4H
498: TSNH5
The, "H," is presumably to identify that these are the high definition versions of the channels. For the purpose of consistency with the other TSN channels, why isn't TSN5 identified as TSN5H but rather as TSNH5? I am not aware of any other channels that use the identifier, TSN5H, so this should not be an issue. The most likely reasoning for this is that someone was sloppy when naming these channels about a decade ago, no quality assurance was completed, and since that time the identifier issue of these channels has been discarded.
Do you have a reason for the naming inconsistency?
If there is no reasoning behind it (other than sloppiness and poor quality assurance), would this be something that you would be able to correct for customers?
**Labels Added**
