05-31-2016 08:39 AM - last edited on 01-27-2017 01:23 PM by RogersRoland
Hello Community,
The Rogers Community Forums has always played an important role in providing important feedback regarding our products and services. We are excited to offer our users an opportunity to participate in a trial of the new firmware for our Rocket Wi-Fi Modem (CGN3ACSMR, CGN3ACR and CGN3AMR) and Rocket Gigabit Wi-Fi Modem (CGN3552 and CODA-4582). This program is exclusive to registered users of the Rogers Community Forums (space is limited).
The new firmware includes the following features and enhancements:
If you are interested in participating, please send a private message to @CommunityHelps with the subject line “Rogers Rocket Wi-Fi Modem Firmware Trial”. A member of our team will be in contact with you and provide you with further instructions.
We’re keen to receive feedback on this new firmware. Once you've received the new firmware, please provide your feedback directly in the FEEDBACK - Rogers Rocket Wi-Fi Modem Firmware Trial thread.
Questions regarding this program can be posted below.
***Please note - you must be a registered user of the Rogers Community Forums in order to participate. To register, please follow these steps.***
Thank you for your continued feedback and support.
02-06-2017 11:37 PM
02-06-2017 11:42 PM
@Mythen, running the CODA-4582 with .23 loaded?
02-06-2017 11:45 PM - edited 02-06-2017 11:58 PM
I have a wifi analyzer on my pixel XL. I have set 2.4 GHz to auto and 5 GHz to 149 I also have that wps turned off. My analyzer indicates there are no good channels on 2.4 GHz. I also have Auth Mode set to WPA2- PSK and encrypt mode to AES. I read somewhere that this will help wifi to be faster.
The tech removed my Coda with the black dot and downgraded me to CGNM 3552 running 4.5.8.22
02-06-2017 11:47 PM
02-06-2017 11:58 PM - edited 02-07-2017 12:00 AM
@Hucklebury, that looks good. TKIP for encrypt mode is actually not compatible with 802.11n, so, using it will force the data rate down to 54Mb/s. TKIP is also no longer secure and should not be used in any form of encryption setting, TKIP on its own or TKIP/AES combo. From what I remember reading, for a Wifi Alliance Certification, vendors can no longer offer TKIP as a stand alone encryption setting. Personal opinion, it should be deleted as a selection, stand alone or combo.
Ok, I see that you're running a 3552 with .22, which is the latest network wide version. Not sure what to think about the Pixel situation in that case.
02-07-2017 12:03 AM
I will wait for the new version. I use wifi on both pixels, 1ipad, 2 tablets, TV, chromecast and android box so I guess thats alot. not all are running at the same time though LOL
02-07-2017 06:11 PM
ok so i put speedtest.net on my pixel XL and getting12.11Mbps down and 11.30 up 120ms ping. downloading apps from the play store on wifi take forever.
02-09-2017 05:59 AM
My modem appears to be broadcasting two 2.4 ghz channels. One of them has my SSID and the other has no SSID. when I switch channels they both move to that channel. Is this possible? I am still having issues with wifi speeds on my Pixels at home. ( 3-5 mins to download app from google play) I know its not the Pixel, at work on a different ISP provider my device is blazing fast. I also noticed at work I get a 3ms ping and at home I get 37 ms.
Frustrated,,,,please help.
02-09-2017 09:53 AM
@Hucklebury wrote:My modem appears to be broadcasting two 2.4 ghz channels. One of them has my SSID and the other has no SSID. when I switch channels they both move to that channel. Is this possible? I am still having issues with wifi speeds on my Pixels at home. ( 3-5 mins to download app from google play) I know its not the Pixel, at work on a different ISP provider my device is blazing fast. I also noticed at work I get a 3ms ping and at home I get 37 ms.
Frustrated,,,,please help.
Do you happen to have a Roku?
02-09-2017 09:56 AM - edited 02-09-2017 10:01 AM
02-09-2017 10:04 AM
The CGN3xxx and CGNM-3552 modems do transmit a secondary wifi beacon. That's the beacon only, no SSID. That beacon does appear to have a negative effect on the wifi performance, and has been noted by many others. As @Mythen has suggested, you could swap modems for the CODA-4582. Beware that the 4582 is a work in progress. Many users have prolems with inconsistent download and upload speeds with that modem. I run mine in Bridge mode with an Asus RT-AC68U behind it and I don't have any complaints other than the usual upload rate that slows down during the day due to the upload traffic in my area. I can hit 48/49 Mb/s very early in the morning and during the day I'll see 25 to 40 Mb/s. As far as I am aware, the 4582 does not transmit a secondary wifi beacon.
02-09-2017 10:16 AM
Wow, I just cant win with Rogers. I get the signals all fixed up now my downloads on wifi are a snails pace. Unreal.
I did already have the coda modem. WEhen the tech fixed the signals he removed it and downgraded. The battle of getting good service has gone too long
02-10-2017 03:43 PM - edited 02-10-2017 03:44 PM
I now have the Coda Modem again with the black dot. I have firmware 2.0.10.23. I am now missing a couple of port ID on the downstream. these were ok on .13 and .19. will a factory reset fix this?
Port ID | Frequency (MHz) | Modulation | Signal strength (dBmV) | Channel ID | Signal noise ratio (dB) |
1 | 591000000 | 256QAM | -0.500 | 14 | 38.605 |
2 | 567000000 | 256QAM | -1.700 | 10 | 38.605 |
3 | 573000000 | 256QAM | -2.100 | 11 | 38.605 |
4 | 579000000 | 256QAM | -2.200 | 12 | 38.605 |
5 | 585000000 | 256QAM | -1.000 | 13 | 38.983 |
6 | 561000000 | 256QAM | -1.700 | 9 | 38.983 |
8 | 603000000 | 256QAM | -1.100 | 16 | 38.605 |
10 | 615000000 | 256QAM | -0.400 | 18 | 38.605 |
11 | 621000000 | 256QAM | -1.000 | 19 | 38.605 |
12 | 633000000 | 256QAM | -1.100 | 20 | 38.605 |
13 | 639000000 | 256QAM | -0.600 | 21 | 38.983 |
14 | 645000000 | 256QAM | -0.200 | 22 | 38.983 |
15 | 651000000 | 256QAM | 0.100 | 23 | 38.605 |
16 | 657000000 | 256QAM | 0.400 | 24 | 38.983 |
17 | 663000000 | 256QAM | 1.200 | 25 | 38.983 |
18 | 669000000 | 256QAM | 1.800 | 26 | 38.983 |
19 | 675000000 | 256QAM | 1.600 | 27 | 38.983 |
20 | 681000000 | 256QAM | 1.100 | 28 | 38.983 |
21 | 687000000 | 256QAM | 2.200 | 29 | 38.605 |
22 | 693000000 | 256QAM | 2.000 | 30 | 38.983 |
23 | 699000000 | 256QAM | 2.300 | 31 | 38.983 |
24 | 705000000 | 256QAM | 1.400 | 32 | 38.605 |
25 | 711000000 | 256QAM | 0.600 | 33 | 38.605 |
26 | 717000000 | 256QAM | 0.000 | 34 | 38.983 |
27 | 723000000 | 256QAM | -2.200 | 35 | 37.636 |
28 | 729000000 | 256QAM | -4.300 | 36 | 37.636 |
29 | 735000000 | 256QAM | -4.900 | 37 | 37.636 |
30 | 741000000 | 256QAM | -3.000 | 38 | 37.356 |
31 | 747000000 | 256QAM | -0.800 | 39 | 38.605 |
32 | 555000000 | 256QAM | -1.900 | 40 | 38.605 |
Receiver | FFT type | Subcarr 0 Frequency(MHz) | PLC locked | NCP locked | MDC1 locked | PLC power(dBmv) |
0 | NA | NA | NO | NO | NO | NA |
1 | NA | NA | NO | NO | NO | NA |
Port ID | Frequency (MHz) | Modulation | Signal strength (dBmV) | Channel ID | Bandwidth |
1 | 23700000 | ATDMA - 64QAM | 38.000 | 2 | 6400000 |
2 | 38595668 | ATDMA - 64QAM | 40.500 | 3 | 3200000 |
3 | 30596000 | ATDMA - 64QAM | 38.250 | 1 | 6400000 |
Channel Index | State | lin Digital Att | Digital Att | BW (sc's*fft) | Report Power | Report Power1_6 | FFT Size |
0 | DISABLED | 0.5000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | -inf | -1.0000 | 4K |
1 | DISABLED | 0.5000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | -inf | -1.0000 | 4K |
© 2017 Hitron Technologies Inc.. All rights reserved.
02-10-2017 03:55 PM
02-10-2017 04:03 PM - edited 02-10-2017 04:08 PM
Thank you, the restart did work!!
what do you recommend for firewall settings? Default is min
02-10-2017 06:17 PM
@Hucklebury I would leave the firewall settings at the default, unless you have a specific reason not to.
02-10-2017 06:33 PM - edited 02-10-2017 06:49 PM
ok will do, I have to thank everybody for all the help. since i went back to coda I can now download an app blazing fast on my Pixel XL.
this is a great forum, I have learned alot.
02-10-2017 06:50 PM
@Hucklebury I'm glad to hear the forum has been able to help you!
02-12-2017 08:57 PM
Hey @RogersDave, can we please have an update? I'm on the gigabit package and I just did a speedtest and I got less than 100mbps down. Most of the time my speeds are somewhat ok, but I am only getting the full gigabit speed extremely rarely. Is there going to be another new modem? The Coda modem does not seem to be working well at all. You mentioned before that you were confident that you could work out all the issues within about a month (you said that in January). If you could please let us know where you guys are at I would really appreciate it. I can understand some inconsistency in my speeds but getting less than 1/10 of the speed I pay for is unacceptable IMO. If you can at least update us as to what's going on and how and when you guys are going to fix it, that would be very helpful.
02-14-2017 11:54 AM - edited 02-14-2017 11:59 AM
I posted my issue in a different thread re: the .23 f/w where yesteday my speed tests were consistenly giving me speeds of 750 compared to the .19 f/w which was giving me 950. My up speeds haven't changed and still giving me 30 up when they should be 50 up.
02-14-2017 05:18 PM
@markopas Some areas are capped at 30mb/s upload, you can call Rogers or send a PM to @CommunityHelps and ask if your area is one of them.