Nextbox 4K PVR might look best with 1080i output!

Need Help?

That's what we're here for! The goal of the Rogers Community is to help you find answers on everything Rogers. Can't find what you're looking for? Just ask!
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Reply
Resident Expert
Resident Expert
Posts: 1,066

Re: Nextbox 4K PVR might look best with 1080i output!


@LSTA wrote:
Interesting responses. Okay then. I'll simply say two things: 1. I've the 4K box because the picture is better on 1080 output--I don't have a 4K TV, but I can see and likely measure the difference the box makes, even over 1080. 2. Even if I had a 4K box, how does watching a 1080i stream in 4K improve things when it's just the box doing the conversion from 1080 interlaced to progressive?

I'm not 100% sure QAM256 is new to the new boxes, I'll have to check once more. But the 1080 picture looked clearer on the 4K box and it was faster to switch channels, etc.

I don't really need 4K until widely available content and OTT boxes catch up later this year, but I do like this 4K PVR for plain 1080 watching! Smiley Happy

I'm surprised you have a 1080p TV and say the 4k box when set to 1080i looks better than a nextbox 3 set to 1080i. Because they should be outputting the same source/input signal without any conversion, 1080i signal from rogers broadcast in, 1080i out. 

 

If you have a 4k tv and 4k nextbox then setting it to 1080i or 1080p wont get you the 4k signal, this is why you have to set it to UltraHD, so you can take advantage of the 4k channels. And for me 4k channels and regulaur HD channels look great on my Samsung KS8000 with the 4k box set to UltraHD.

 



Resident Expert
Resident Expert
Posts: 1,066

Re: Nextbox 4K PVR might look best with 1080i output!


@Lurker wrote:

History lesson:

 

The old 8300HD PVRs did passthru resolution (changed the box's resolution based on the input).

 

People complained non stop that they didn't have an HD guide.

 

With NextBox 2.0 and the RTN guide, Rogers gave people an HD guide, but had to do it by fixing the displayed resolution.

 

...and now people are complaining.

 

In short, Rogers can never win.


Yes, I actually miss that feature because I set it to passthrough so it would display 1080i, or 720p depending what channel I was watching. It would be nice if Rogers could do that with the new boxes for the HD and UltraHD channels. That way they can make a 4k format guide, and scale to a 1080i/720p format guide, and let the signal passthrough so the TV does the final conversion. 



I'm a Trusted Advisor
Posts: 31,981

Re: Nextbox 4K PVR might look best with 1080i output!

Hello @Lurker

Agreed. It's not more complaining but more of them saying what they want which is great but when will it end? Not everyone wants the same as others and when they get it, many will complain. No company wins.

I do wish this feature was back on the boxes but many as you said complained about it. So there is no win unfortunately
I'm a Trusted Advisor
Posts: 31,981

Re: Nextbox 4K PVR might look best with 1080i output!

Hello @LSTA

I have to agree with @gp-se. Not boxes output the same thing on 1080i. The only difference between both boxes is the 4K PVR box can output in 4K.

As gp-se and I said if u have both a 4K box and a 4K tv then it's useless not putting it on Ultra HD setting as then you lose the 4K resolution and the purpose of having the 4K PVR box. Having a 65inch 4K OLED and a Sony 55X850XBR and watching in Ultra HD is better then 1080i on that box.

If you want a standard 1080i feed then I would suggest getting the NextBox 3.0 ( for ones that are reading this post)
I'm a Senior Advisor
Posts: 951

Re: Nextbox 4K PVR might look best with 1080i output!

History lesson addendum:

With passthru resolution on the 8300, channel changes were painfully slow, and people complained.

Fixing the resolution sped up channel changes as well.
Highlighted
I Plan to Stick Around
Posts: 15

Re: Nextbox 4K PVR might look best with 1080i output!

Lurker, thanks very much for your "history lessons", as someone who went from analog cable to OTT to these new Nextbox devices, I missed out on the older set top boxes.

My response:

1. The setting for passthrough should be optional.

2. Now that even SD channels are delivered at 1080i resolution, an HD guide is not at issue, though a 4K guide might be. If so, folks have the preference to pick 4K output for everyday use.

3. Slowness changing channels shouldn't be an issue when 99% of channels are 1080i: just keep the output at 1080i and only swap output if the resolution changes. This should mean that 99% of the time, nothing changes whatsoever.

As to the differences in signal between Nextbox 3.0 HD PVR and the 4K PVR, I'll re-install the HD PVR to take photos of the diagnostics to confirm the change from 64 to 256 QAM. If true, this change in compression could then have lead to 2-4x improvement in image quality on the 4K box, thus explaining the difference I was seeing.
I Plan to Stick Around
Posts: 15

Re: Nextbox 4K PVR might look best with 1080i output!

Introduction

Okay, I'm reporting back after having done more tests head-to-head with the 4K PVR and the Nextbox 3.0 HD PVR, such as by watching and recording the same live TV program.

 

1. HD vs 4K PVRs, not so different--Both have terrible MPEG2 compression.

I can confirm that in settings, both PVRs show they are capturing at QAM 256, and that the blurriness I was seeing on the HD PVR was actually MPEG2 compression applied equally horribly to both boxes, and varies from scene to scene.

 

The best quality is content that is easily compressed: simple line art in animated cartoons, for example, or still photographs in a Ken Burns style, or interviews/talking heads on a blurry or simple background.

 

What looks terrible is wide arial shots from above, moving or hand-held camera, or animations where everything is in motion on sceren because the camera is "panning" quickly. As it happens, I'm perhaps more sensitive than most to this kind of issue. What also looks especially terrible is already-compressed footage, like when a documentary shows footage from a camcorder or cellphone, or if a show or channel is streamed with compression to Rogers, and then Rogers re-streams it applying further compression. I can't yet pinpoint this, because I've yet to see any content without noticable compression artifacts and blurring, so it's hard to say whether I'm seeing a double-compressed channel, or simply content that reacts better or worse to the MPEG2 compression Rogers uses.

 

2. Further thoughts on 1080i vs 1080p, it's about life-like motion

I can say that 1080i vs 1080p shows more with some content. It's less about compression though, here it's more about the smoothness of motion, and how true-to-life it is. Motion in 1080i from a source that's 1080i is going to feel more life-like. If you hit the Replay button and watch the same scene in 1080p when the original was interlaced, you'll find that you're more confused during motion as to what's happening on-screen. Let me rephrase this: with an interlaced source, and very rapidly changing pixels on screen, the progressive display of such a source has to be de-interlaced, which means pretending or predicting what half the screen should look like based on what came before.

 

When interlaced, this artificial prediciton or timing change doesn't occur and instead you see basically just the pixels you were meant to see. It's true, in 1080i, the guide doesn't look as nice because you've only half the pixels to work with in one direction, but the smoothness of motion more than makes up for this. You can notice this easily in shows like Archer with complicated backgrounds that animate smoothly -- it looks more smooth in 1080i than 1080p. You can also notice this in nature documentaries involving bubbling water or irregular motions of wind -- with 1080p I found myself distracted, counting water ripples in surprise, but with 1080i it was smoother, instead of paying attention to each ripple, I was noticing the source of the ripples and able to predict the next one myself.

 

3. Thoughts on 4K/HD PVR hardware internals -- is the 4K PVR technologically worth it?

That said, while 1080i helps, the lack of difference between HD and 4K PVRs indicates to me that the only advantages the 4K PVR has is speed: the HD PVR has a 3000 DMIPS speed processor included in the SoC https://www.broadcom.com/products/broadband/set-top-box/bcm7425 while the Technicolor CAV10455 has a 12000 DMIPS dual-core processor that's both 4 times faster and dual-core, so better able to multi-task.

 

The 4K PVR (CAV10455) doesn't list its processor, but the only SoC with MoCA support that I could easily find on Google with a 12000 DMIPS processor is STM's STiH418, and I'm seeing references in blogs & LinkedIn that Technicolor used this chip in trials in France. STM appears to be withdrawing from set-top boxes, so it's possible future Technicolor STBs will use Broadcom designs.

 

Of course, thanks to standards, an ARM chip is an ARM chip, and while a 12,000 DMIPS design is slower than the 21,000 DMIPS chips Broadcom is now producing, it's still faster than the 2012-era 3000 DMIPS boxes. The HD PVR has 1 GB of DDR3, the 4K PVR if I'm reading the diagnostics correctly, also has only 1 GB of DDR3.

 

So I wouldn't expect any fancy new apps or web browsing to appear on these PVRs anytime soon. And given that the hard drive inside is unchanged, just 1 TB, I'm starting to think that $499 is overpriced for this kind of technology. For example, if I've done the math correctly, the 12,000 DMIPS processor inside here is barely faster than an iPhone 5. Based on noise and heat, looking down on the 4K PVR from above, the hard drive is on the left side while the SoC and mainboard are probably occupying 3-4 inches across on the right side. There's no air movement, just the clicking of a hard drive, so it's passively cooled.

 

Cheapest price I could find on a 1TB HDD is $45. Add another $150 for the system boards, $50 for the housing, remote and cables, and I'm betting Technicolor can build one of these for $150-250, sells it to Rogers for $250-350 and Rogers then re-sells it for $500 or $25/month, whatever it can get away with. The real profit lies in convincing folks to pay $4/channel under the new pricing when Rogers pays at most 40¢/channel for most channels.

 

Conclusion: Until Rogers upgrades 1080i to HEVC 1080p, ignore the 4K PVR if you don't care about 4K channels

I suppose what I'm doing here is trying to convince myself that if I have a plan with a discounted HD PVR, I shouldn't bother getting the 4K box until Rogers improves its codecs from MPEG2 to nicer-looking HEVC for all 1080p channels. Until that time, I'll just be distracted by the alternating great-looking and horrible-looking MPEG2 compression, and that's really the enemy here. Smiley Happy

I'm a Trusted Advisor
Posts: 31,981

Re: Nextbox 4K PVR might look best with 1080i output!

Hello @LSTA

Thank you for taking the time to write that!

To each their own. Most that want the 4K PVR box have a 4K tv or will be getting one. As we all said, if u babe a normal HD tv, then go for the NB3.0 BOX. Smiley Happy
I'm a Regular
Posts: 301

Re: Nextbox 4K PVR might look best with 1080i output!

Why not have a "pass through" option for the NB3 and 4K boxes? Is it a limitation of the software (Navigatr) or the hardware? I understand that Rogers broadcasts most channels in 1080i so setting the NB3 to 1080i is best but what about those channels that are 720p? Or the OnDemand content that's 1080p? Keeping the box at 1080i means the content is scaled down or up by the box and then again by the TV...not good. Pass through would allow the box to just pass the signal straight to the TV regardless of what it is from the channel.
Resident Expert
Resident Expert
Posts: 1,066

Re: Nextbox 4K PVR might look best with 1080i output!


@toolcubed wrote:
Why not have a "pass through" option for the NB3 and 4K boxes? Is it a limitation of the software (Navigatr) or the hardware? I understand that Rogers broadcasts most channels in 1080i so setting the NB3 to 1080i is best but what about those channels that are 720p? Or the OnDemand content that's 1080p? Keeping the box at 1080i means the content is scaled down or up by the box and then again by the TV...not good. Pass through would allow the box to just pass the signal straight to the TV regardless of what it is from the channel.

I would love that feature as well. However at this point Rogers wont spend the resources on a dying platform. Next year we will get hybrid iptv using the comcast X1 platform.