CODA-4582 - Open Issues for Investigation

Need Help?

That's what we're here for! The goal of the Rogers Community is to help you find answers on everything Rogers. Can't find what you're looking for? Just ask!
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Reply
Network Architect
Network Architect
Posts: 611

Re: CODA-4582 - Open Issues for Investigation


@JohnBeaudin wrote:

@RogersDave

 

Can we a do a test Dave, can you turn off Speedboost on my modem? so I can test and see if I get better results in gaming?


It is not something easy to do in production. The Speedboost parameters is tied to your Tier of service.

 

In order to disable Speedboost on a specific tier, we have to build a new configuration file, deploy in production and assign your modem to it.

 

I downgraded my test modem to 150u service and I will be running some test. In parallel, I downgraded the modem from one of the Hitron engineer to 150u and tasked him to play League of Legends for the rest of the day Smiley Happy

 

Hopefully, he'll see some results and will be able to collect the appropriate logs.

 

Dave

 

I'm a Reliable Contributor
Posts: 578

Re: CODA-4582 - Open Issues for Investigation

Rogers doesn't use any separate modem for gigabit connections. Their FTTH is RFoG, so the fibre connection is converted to coax in the home and the modem that is used is the same as the ones we are provided.
I'm a Reliable Contributor
Posts: 604

Re: CODA-4582 - Open Issues for Investigation

ok Thanks @RogersDave !

 

 

I'm Here A Lot
Posts: 5

Re: CODA-4582 - Open Issues for Investigation

That's right. Rogers Fibre comes to my basement, then they have this converter I call it which turns the wire into a regular cable wire which is connected to my modem. I am on the old 250U package with the old advance wifi router/modem. (I do have access to the other competitor fibre as well, but I can get a better promo with Rogers)

 

I am just warry to signing up for gigtabit package and experience speed and other issues which folks have described here.

 

I Plan to Stick Around
Posts: 274

Re: CODA-4582 - Open Issues for Investigation

@RogersDave

I got to say that's a pretty rough job to have. Playing league of legends all day. Lol
I'm a Reliable Contributor
Posts: 604

Re: CODA-4582 - Open Issues for Investigation

Well you can make him play CSGO as well

 

make him join official servers

 

make sure he runs net_Graph 3 in console so he can monitor the ping and packet loss.

I Plan to Stick Around
Posts: 75

Re: CODA-4582 - Open Issues for Investigation


@Adva wrote:

That's right. Rogers Fibre comes to my basement, then they have this converter I call it which turns the wire into a regular cable wire which is connected to my modem. I am on the old 250U package with the old advance wifi router/modem. (I do have access to the other competitor fibre as well, but I can get a better promo with Rogers)

 

I am just warry to signing up for gigtabit package and experience speed and other issues which folks have described here.

 


I just got a flyer/notice in the mail last week that Rogers (via Pentagon Group) will be upgrading buried services in my neighbourhood over the next few weeks/month.  At first, I thought this was simply a notice that they're going to be burying the temp drop lines that myself and my neighbours on both sides have (all of us got our Rogers cables accidentally cut last fall when Bell came and installed FTTH in my neighbourhood).  I'm wondering if the notice is for something bigger in scope upgrade wise though.

Rogers Employee 4kgigabitguy
Rogers Employee
Posts: 45

Re: CODA-4582 - Open Issues for Investigation

Hey @RyzenFX

 

I ran another test on Leauge of Legends last night(result below). I posted my upstream & downstream logs as well. I also played 1 match of CSGO ( I suck at that game, I'm used to call of duty with a controller lol )

 

lol2.jpg

 

Downstream Overview
Port ID Frequency (MHz) Modulation Signal strength (dBmV) Channel ID Signal noise ratio (dB)
1 609000000 256QAM -5.100 10 37.636
2 561000000 256QAM -5.400 2 37.356
3 567000000 256QAM -5.600 3 37.356
4 573000000 256QAM -5.400 4 37.356
5 579000000 256QAM -5.300 5 37.636
6 585000000 256QAM -4.800 6 38.605
7 591000000 256QAM -4.900 7 37.356
8 597000000 256QAM -4.900 8 37.636
9 603000000 256QAM -5.000 9 38.983
10 555000000 256QAM -5.400 1 37.356
11 615000000 256QAM -4.800 11 37.636
12 621000000 256QAM -4.900 12 38.605
13 633000000 256QAM -4.400 13 38.605
14 639000000 256QAM -4.900 14 37.636
15 645000000 256QAM -4.700 15 37.636
16 651000000 256QAM -5.000 16 37.636
17 657000000 256QAM -4.800 17 37.636
18 663000000 256QAM -4.800 18 37.636
19 669000000 256QAM -5.200 19 37.356
20 675000000 256QAM -5.100 20 37.636
21 681000000 256QAM -5.500 21 37.356
22 687000000 256QAM -5.400 22 37.636
23 693000000 256QAM -5.900 23 37.356
24 699000000 256QAM -6.200 24 37.356
25 705000000 256QAM -6.500 25 37.356
26 711000000 256QAM -6.700 26 37.356
27 717000000 256QAM -6.500 27 37.636
28 723000000 256QAM -6.700 28 37.356
29 825000000 256QAM -8.600 29 37.636
30 831000000 256QAM -9.000 30 37.356
31 837000000 256QAM -8.900 31 37.636
32 843000000 256QAM -9.100 32 37.356

 

Upstream Overview
Port ID Frequency (MHz) Modulation Signal strength (dBmV) Channel ID Bandwidth
1 30596000 ATDMA - 64QAM 43.500 4 6400000
2 38595609 ATDMA - 64QAM 46.500 6 3200000
3 23700000 ATDMA - 64QAM 43.250 5 6400000
I'm a Reliable Contributor
Posts: 604

Re: CODA-4582 - Open Issues for Investigation

@4kgigabitguy

 

Waiting for the image to get approved, I wan to look into that.

 

Rogers Employee 4kgigabitguy
Rogers Employee
Posts: 45

Re: CODA-4582 - Open Issues for Investigation


@Telek wrote:

@JohnBeaudin wrote:

A few people also tested the 3552 for gaming vs the CODA and it's a lot better on the 3552, all theory points in the direction that the 3552 is handling better so far, CODA is still on beta and it should out perform the 3552 easily, however we might not see that until a few firmwares fix. but once that's done we should finally see what the CODA is capable of.


This is working on the assumption that the hardware is fit. We know that the chipset has major issues. We know that the hardware design itself has issues (hence the need for extra shielding, and known problems with WiFi interference).  I don't think that it's safe to assume that this modem will ever be better, and FirmWare fixes will likely only be to work around hardware limitations.


Interesting points, I never tried out the 3552......I honestly thought that modem did not perform as well due to the issues indicated in @Telek post.... I went from CGN3ACSMR to the CODA modem. Catching up on the discussions that happened in the past.